Search for: "Roll v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 1,930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it was likely to allow mifepristone, one of two drugs used in medication abortions, to remain widely available in the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Amy Howe
On Tuesday, the justices will hear arguments in a case seeking to roll back access to mifepristone, the drug used in medication abortions, which account for more than half of all abortions in the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
Finally, there are three defendants based outside of the EU – Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC in the United States and Google Payment Limited in the United Kingdom. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:57 pm by NARF
(Indian Civil Rights Act; Tribal Court) United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1928), foregrounded a right to privacy, an idea that would only later become a core part of liberalism, with Supreme Court decisions such as Griswold v. [read post]