Search for: "Roosevelt v. Roosevelt (1981)"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
’” (Kim Roosevelt’s amicus brief is just terrific in explaining that Section 3 applies of its own force. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal became the dominant political canon. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Parker, became the Democrat nominee for President against the incumbent, Republican Theodore Roosevelt. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 8:53 am
Jackson’s Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Regan (1981), Regan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 6:30 pm
Marin, Marguerite V. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:00 pm
Regan, 453 U.S. 654, 686 (1981). [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
Shaver v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:34 am
The Section 1981, Section 1983, and state-law claims survived as to the CEO in her individual capacity (Lewis v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am
” The current version of the order, Executive Order 12333, was issued by President Reagan in 1981, and amended by President George W. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:06 pm
The Supreme Court scene isn't long, but it's powerful.First Monday in October (1981). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:02 am
Roosevelt (1981), telling that the polio attack occurred in 1921. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
This point derives from the 1981 Pennhurst decision as applied in the 2012 NFIB decision. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Luke’s Hospital v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Roosevelt (2003). [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
The history of how this came to be is vexed, and we need not review the involved story of the roles variously played by Professor Glueck, Colonel Chanler, Colonel Bernays, President Roosevelt, Secretary Stimson, Justice Jackson, and Baron Shawcross that led to framing the trial around the crime of aggressive war.[11] As Jonathan Bush has demonstrated, the decision made for sharp disagreements not only among the Allied powers – the French in particular never accepted this stratagem… [read post]
