Search for: "Rosado v Rosado"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am
Encalada v McCarthy, Chachanover & Rosado, LLP, 160 AD3d 475 [1st Dept 2018] [the plaintiff’s testimony about his initial conversation with counsel raised issues of fact and credibility for the factfinder to decide]). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am
Rosado is a pro-se legal malpractice case which comes after plaintiff has settled a case, and then wriggled to get out of the settlement. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am
Rosado is an example of what courts fear in the legal malpractice field: metastasizing suits, each based upon the earlier suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In Rosado-Ciriello, et al, [Plaintiffs] v Yonkers City School District, et al, [District], the Appellate Division considered a proceeding pursuant to CPLR Article 78 to review a determination of the District, and to compel the District to consider "telework" as a viable work accommodation for the Plaintiffs' members in the collective bargaining unit. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
Rosado are dismissed. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:40 am
Duckles v Zatkowsky 2023 NY Slip Op 31942(U) June 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156173/2022 Judge: Mary V. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:05 pm
The case, Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:36 am
Rosado is an interesting variant on the more usual case where Plaintiff is being sued for fees and brings a legal malpractice case against the attorney. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:00 pm
Justice Mary V. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
”# # #SOURCEDECISION & ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (January 9, 2023) (Rosado, J.)Housing Rights Initiative v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:50 am
”# # #SOURCEDECISION & ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS (January 9, 2023) (Rosado, J.)Housing Rights Initiative v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
The following is a guest post by Jesús Colón Rosado, an intern working in the Public Services Division at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:00 am
A recent case, Lake Naomi Club, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:23 pm
The Solicitor General is set to file its response to the cert. petition in Fitisemanu v. [read post]
