Search for: "Roy Mosley"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2021, 4:08 pm
Mr Justice Mann stressed that he was awarding Richard far higher damages (£190,000) than those awarded to Max Mosley (£60,000) in his privacy action case against the News of the World because the invasion of privacy here was at least “twice [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:09 pm
They just prefer to talk about Mosley than about Leveson 2. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Roy Greenslade is giving up his valuable and insightful daily media blog in the Guardian. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
Max Mosley has denied money to fund press regulator Impress was put together by his father and 1930s fascist leader Oswald Mosley, and said ‘Impress is completely independent – where the money is coming from doesn’t matter’. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
It has a funding agreement with something called the Independent Press Regulation Trust (IPRT), a charitable trust funded in turn by the Alexander Mosley Charitable Trust (AMCT), whose main donor is Max Mosley. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
It has a funding agreement with something called the Independent Press Regulation Trust (IPRT), a charitable trust funded in turn by the Alexander Mosley Charitable Trust (AMCT), whose main donor is Max Mosley. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
”As Roy Greenslade has pointed out in the Guardian, the press has denied any wrongdoing. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
Roy Greenslade in the Guardian has questioned why News UK continued to employ Mahmood, “ignoring every warning sign about Mahmood’s dodgy form of investigative journalism”. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 7:13 am
The well known case of Mosley v NGN [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) confirms that there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in sexual activity with prostitutes. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
The complaint will pose a challenge for Ipso chairman, Sir Alan Moses, argues Roy Greenslade, adding that the Sun seems confident in the story. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 7:47 am
As Roy Greenslade recently wrote, it’s perhaps an unpalatable truth but people everywhere are more interested in “what happens to those who are closest to them”. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
The decision was, nevertheless, controversial as the all the claimants were awarded more than the previous highest damages in a privacy case (the £60,000 paid to Max Mosley in 2008. [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm
“The dispute is settled, to the satisfaction of both sides,” Mosley’s lawyer said. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
Roy Greenslade had a piece about this here. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 2:31 am
As Roy Greenslade commented in the Observer, the British press was striving to balance freedom and responsibility. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
Hence the nauseating spectacle in the Max Mosley case of the News of the World defence team inventing, on a daily basis, ever more ludicrous, and decidedly ex post facto, ‘public interest’ defences for a story in which there was not a shred of public interest, as properly understood. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Max Mosley’s evidence that only the richest one per cent can take on the newspapers was widely reported. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
Over the past fortnight Lord Justice Leveson has heard evidence on the future of press regulation for module four of the inquiry. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
Meanwhile, Roy Greenslade has a post entitled “One year on … what happened to the News of the World’staff? [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The FT reported here, Press Gazette here and the Guardian’s Roy Greenslade here. [read post]
