Search for: "Royston v. Royston"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Thanks also to Tom Royston, counsel for JA, and Shelter, acting for JA. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Many journalists struggle with reporting the results from risk factor epidemiology. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
”) Schwab v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
See Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, LLP v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:59 am
In light of the reluctance of courts to impair the sanctity of contracts or vested rights, Royston, Rayzor, Vickery, & Williams, LLP v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:33 pm
Feldman v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
Richmont Holdings v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:15 am
My thanks to Tom Royston of Garden Court North for alerting us and for the following case note highlighting the issue. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
In Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, LLP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
BRAD LIVINGSTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, No. 13-0867 Set to be argued on March 25, 2015 ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:54 am
BRAD LIVINGSTON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, No. 13-0867 Chosen for future argument by order issued February 20, 2015 ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm
In R(Winder) v Sandwell MBC, EHRC intervening [2014] EWHC 2617 (Admin), Hickinbottom J rightly struck down the residence requirements on all grounds. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
According to Icon, the invention disclosed and claimed in the application was actually devised by Icon General Manager Royston Douglas Bull (‘Bull’), had been misappropriated by Scott, and wrongfully made the subject of the application in Scott’s name. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 10:38 pm
According to Icon, the invention disclosed and claimed in the application was actually devised by Icon General Manager Royston Douglas Bull (‘Bull’), had been misappropriated by Scott, and wrongfully made the subject of the application in Scott’s name. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:19 pm
Mordenti v. [read post]
