Search for: "Russell, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
He argued that the concealment of the murals resulted in both an impermissible modification and destruction of his works, but the United States District Court for the District of Vermont disagreed.[15] Denying the injunction, the district court held that under VARA, the modification or destruction of a work of visual art requires a physical alteration to the work itself.[16] After the district court’s preliminary ruling, it granted VLS’s motion for summary judgment, which Kerson… [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 10:30 am
Russell, the court held that a filing deadline for appealing a federal district court decision to a Circuit Court of Appeals is jurisdictional. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm
No scholar has assembled a universe of data linking business operations, injuries, and claims to litigation and appeals. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Reed and Russell M. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 8:07 am
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled the CTA unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiffs in that case, but the ruling was quickly appealed. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
They say the “Appeal to Heaven” banner has taken on apocalyptic overtones that are increasingly present in the centers of American power. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 8:50 am
Russell v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court as the justices unanimously ruled that appeals judges were too quick to dismiss the NRA’s claims that New York officials violated its First Amendment rights by targeting its insurance business. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
Russell and Diamond were the boots on the ground, building and running the business of ACM. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:29 pm
The Constitutional Court, upon hearing the case on appeal, clarified that the Covid-19 regulations did not oblige tribunals to publish all judicial files—only to conduct notifications virtually. [read post]
16 May 2024, 2:09 pm
Assuming the City appeals, this case will be one to watch. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The petitioner appeals. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
The petitioner appeals. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, May 10, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 3-9, 2024 Defenseless companies invite activism Posted by Miles Rogerson, Diligent Market Intelligence, on Friday, May 3, 2024 Tags: Activism, Activists, corporate defense, corporate defense score, Russell 3000 Evolving lines of responsibility between the board and the management Posted… [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, May 10, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 3-9, 2024 Defenseless companies invite activism Posted by Miles Rogerson, Diligent Market Intelligence, on Friday, May 3, 2024 Tags: Activism, Activists, corporate defense, corporate defense score, Russell 3000 Evolving lines of responsibility between the board and the management Posted… [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
See, In re Russell, 48 F.2d 668 (CCPA 1931); Application of Miller, 418 F.2d 1392 (C.C.P.A. 1969). [read post]
4 May 2024, 11:53 pm
Religious education and collective worship in Northern Ireland The week saw an important judgment by the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal, JR87, Application for Judicial Review [2024] NICA 34, in which it upheld the legality both of RE and of collective worship. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 6:30 am
The New York State Court of Appeals has held that the City Human Rights Law, one of the most expansive in the nation, does not allow plaintiffs to sue co-workers for discrimination, including the creation of a hostile work environment.The case is Russell v. [read post]
