Search for: "S G v. J G" Results 1 - 20 of 3,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
The court's decision affects individuals from the following countries who were denied visas under what has been termed the "Muslim travel ban" passed by former President Donald J. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Certes, les actes sexuels survenus à Magog et ceux survenus à Bonsecours ont fait l’objet de 1 seul chef d’accusation, et la règle générale est qu’une ordonnance de tenue d’un nouveau procès après l’annulation d’un acquittement vise un procès complet. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Procureur général du Canada c. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 3:18 am by SHG
It’s normal for a justice or two to show up at a black tie affair of the Supreme Court Historical Society, so Justice Sam Alito’s presence, along with C,J. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 1:55 am by Frank Cranmer
” Similar sentiments had been expressed by Munby LJ in Re G [2012] EWCA Civ 1233 [22] and by Baker J in Re A & D [2010] EWHC 2503 [21 & 24]. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
It’s easy to dismiss complaints about a pro-contact culture by saying ‘well, it’s just the law’. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The mark was found to be invalid for being contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality, and applies the CJEU's guidance from the FACK JU GÖHTE judgment in detail. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Treated the Plaintiff's petition as one which transferred the matter to the Appellate Division for de novo review pursuant to CPLR 7804(g); and3. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Treated the Plaintiff's petition as one which transferred the matter to the Appellate Division for de novo review pursuant to CPLR 7804(g); and3. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The Guardian’s report can be read here. [read post]