Search for: "S S v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 226,659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Anyway, here's an en banc opinion unanimously holding that the complaint in a challenge to California's A.B. 5 does not state an equal-protection claim, overturning an earlier panel opinion that held, equally unanimously, that it did. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am by Eric Goldman
I can’t see what’s happening in state court, but I have no reason to believe that it’s any less contentious. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:08 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following 217 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in May 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration         Number           Wordmark 7377089 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377091 MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7377090 M MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA 7383748 GUIDED PATHWAYS 7383753 GAME CHANGERS 7383747 PURPOSE FIRST 7383749 MOMENTUM PATHWAYS 7378370 KATHLEEN POST 7382555… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:39 am by Amy Howe
The justices have not yet issued their decision in that case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:14 am by John Floyd
  Hamilton was correct, but the constitutional scholar could not have foreseen, in his wildest imagination, the Court’s decision-making in Bush v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:54 am by John Floyd
  In a May 22, 2024 report, Forbes Magazine called attention to some of Alito’s past behaviors and court decisions that underscore his long held ultra-right wing political ideology: his college-days involvement with a Princeton University alumni group that didn’t allow women or minorities as members; his vocal “not true” opposition to former President Barak Obama criticism of the Court’s handling of a campaign finance ruling during a… [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Today's advance release criminal law opinions: State v. [read post]