Search for: "S. G." Results 1 - 20 of 50,123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:05 am by Alex Phipps
After defendant’s conviction, he appealed, arguing recusal was required. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by JR Chaves
Esta sentencia, sale al paso de fijar doctrina casacional sobre el sentido del silencio cuando se solicita la convocatoria de la carrera profesional para personal funcionario contemplada en un Acuerdo autonómico, pues la Administración no efectúa la convocatoria aduciendo que está negociando con más pausa que prisa la evaluación. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 3:14 am
" In re YMF Carpets, Inc., Serial No. 90822795 (June 4, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen S. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The agencies note that they could allow the self-identification methodology to be left to the discretion of the covered institution (subject to the agency’s authority to designate additional significant risk-takers), or they could require that a covered institution’s identification methodology, at a minimum, capture covered persons who receive annual base salary and incentive-based compensation that places the covered persons among the top 2% of all covered persons… [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:28 am by Jean O'Grady
Are there any usage limitations e,g, caps of the number of questions or results? [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Eberl)Revivification in ECPR and TA-NRP: A Consideration of Intent and Impact (Rachel G. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:58 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Oil industry asks Supreme Court to block climate change lawsuits from California, other states (David G. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:05 pm by Jonathan M. Mofsky
The CAM’s or representative’s hours of availability. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The mark was found to be invalid for being contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality, and applies the CJEU's guidance from the FACK JU GÖHTE judgment in detail. [read post]