Search for: "S. L. K., individually" Results 1 - 20 of 1,594
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 9:56 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Zapata Off-Shore Co.,[10] where Petitioner Unterweser agreed to tow respondent’s drilling rig from Louisiana to Italy, with a forum [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:00 am
By setting these clear legal limits, ARS 28-1381 aims to deter individuals from driving under the influence [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
But a necessary feature of a charitable trust is that there are no defined, individual beneficiaries. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
Judges write opinions, legislators write statutes, courts draft rules, litigants write motions, businesses draft contracts, and individuals write wills. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It can be “modest, minor, and/or episodic,” can relate to the need to maintain the employee’s or fetus’s health during pregnancy, or can involve seeking health care related to the pregnancy. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
14 May 2024, 9:55 am by Wiggam Law
Letter 227-L Letter 227-L serves as an acknowledgment of your response to Letter 226-J and that the IRS  has revised your proposed penalty. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:58 am by Paul Maharg
Individually and collectively we need to work with the manifesto. [read post]