Search for: "SACK v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Department of Defense. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Yury Orekhov and Svetlana Kuzurgasheva have been accused of purchasing “sensitive” military and dual-use technologies from the U.S. and shipping them to Russian companies, including some that service the country’s defense sector, the Justice Department said in a statement. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
And one of the things, especially for the book College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA’s Amateur Myth, I worked with Allen Sack who had played formally at the University of Notre Dame and also was on the academic side of things. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:35 am
The case is entitled Port of Tacoma v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Kurup discussed the Supreme Court’s decision to hear United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 9:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The purpose of a reply is to respond to new material or affirmative defenses set forth in an answer (8 NYCRR §§275.3 and 275.14). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The purpose of a reply is to respond to new material or affirmative defenses set forth in an answer (8 NYCRR §§275.3 and 275.14). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The purpose of a reply is to respond to new material or affirmative defenses set forth in an answer (8 NYCRR §§275.3 and 275.14). [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
The purpose of a reply is to respond to new material or affirmative defenses set forth in an answer (8 NYCRR §§275.3 and 275.14). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm
Those concerns have persisted; a 146-page report published by the Department of Defense earlier this month highlighted the threats that Chinese supply chains pose to the defense industrial base. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 6:14 pm
Department of Defense, a 2016 case for which Kavanaugh wrote the opinion, as evidence that he had flip-flopped on the issue. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The New Decision – Abu Gosh v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
He seeks to cripple the civilian agencies—the State Department, USAID, and the United States Institute of Peace—that consolidate combat success into political victory. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:04 am
The recent case – Sack v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 1:07 pm
Supreme Court in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:46 am
Paul Rosenzweig had some questions on the Department of Defense’s “third offset” strategy. [read post]
