Search for: "SC Public Interest Foundation v. SC House" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 3:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Finally, the BIA’s CEQA suit alleges that Plan Bay Area violates SB 375’s jobs-housing balance requirement and its mandate that the SCS adequately plan for housing the entire regional population; according to the BIA, these flaws have rendered the CEQA process a “post-hoc rationalization” of a plan providing for woefully inadequate housing. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Unknown
Tim Scott (R-SC), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, emphasized their belief that the proposed climate risk disclosure regulation exceeds the SEC’s statutory authorities.The trio warned that, under West Virginia v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
Under Clause (5), the State could make any law, imposing reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right of a citizen to acquire and dispose of or hold property in the interest of the general public. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: there are a few, like USB House. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Readers may also be interested in Major Highlights of the January 6th Report. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
” In their decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Domenech was earlier found to have met in 2017 with attorneys for his former employer, the Texas Public Policy Foundation, while the conservative think tank and the Interior Department were battling over a lawsuit, creating the appearance of a conflict-of-interest. [read post]