Search for: "SCALES v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS"
Results 1 - 20
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:29 pm
To be sure, the purpose of the IFR is to seek to comply with a 2021 Supreme Court decision, United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
Copyright Office is essential for gaining legal advantages, including the ability to sue for infringement, claim statutory damages, and recover attorney’s fees. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
See State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
Also issued was a declaration: Declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border of the United States; and several executive orders, "Protecting the American People Against Invasion"; "Securing Our Borders"; "Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship"; "Clarifying The Military’s Role In Protecting The Territorial Integrity Of The United States" and "Designating Cartels And… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
One of the most striking elements of the Executive Order is in its form. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
On November 21, 2006 James Clark's attorney filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Frederick Baron formerly served as associate deputy attorney general and director of the Executive Office for National Security in the Department of Justice. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
"); United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC, 2010 WL 5140729 (M.D. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
This aspect of the plain view doctrine was discussed in a series of United States Supreme Court cases. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
Readers are requested to notify the Reporter ofDecisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 6:01 am
Specifically, may the executing officer conduct a strip search? [read post]
