Search for: "SHAH v. SHAH" Results 1 - 20 of 599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
It approved the US approach (Hilton v Guyot) to the effect that: ‘The application of the doctrine of comity means that the recognition of foreign decisions is not out of obligation, but rather out of convenience and utility’ [para 59]. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by James W. Ward
Shah pointed to a California Supreme Court case (Schachter v. [read post]
     Enforcement Highlights: Ongoing Enforcement Sweeps as an Efficient and Effective Means of Changing Behavior Both Deputy Director Wadhwa and Associate Regional Director Tejal Shah spoke of sweeps as an effective tool to shape market behavior, particularly noting the industry’s widespread reaction to the off-channel communications sweep and resulting remedial efforts. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:52 am by Unknown
Kinjal Shah, Crypto Freedom Alliance of Texas Chair and General Partner at Blockchain Capital, said, “Texas should move forward and lead by example with sensible crypto policies that protect consumers and investors, and foster innovation. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Tess Bridgeman
Hathaway (@oonahathaway), Yuval Shany (@yuvalshany1), Paras Shah (@pshah518) and Clara Apt (@claraapt25) (January 26, 2024) Top Experts’ Views of Int’l Court of Justice Ruling on Israel Gaza Operations (South Africa v Israel, Genocide Convention Case) By Just Security (January 26, 2024) Unpacking the Int’l Court of Justice Judgment in South Africa v Israel (Genocide Case) By Ryan Goodman (@rgoodlaw) and Siven Watt (@SivenWatt) (January 26, 2024)… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 8:24 am by Just Security
Israel-Hamas War Between Rhetoric and Effects: The ICJ Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 7:22 am by Just Security
Israel Paras Shah (@pshah518) interview with Adil Ahmad Haque (@AdHaque110), Oona A. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Later today the Just Security podcast, with host Paras Shah, will feature Professors Oona Hathaway, Adil Haque, and Yuval Shany discussing the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Saaed Shah and Benoit Faucon report for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Elections Paras Shah (@pshah518) interview with Allison Mollenkamp The Just Security Podcast: Can the World Move Away from Fossil Fuels? [read post]