Search for: "SHERMAN ACQUISITION LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 7:03 am
Justice Department (DOJ) announced yesterday that it has filed suit, along with 29 states and the District of Columbia, charging Live Nation Entertainment Inc. and its subsidiary Ticketmaster LLC with monopolizing the live-events industry in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
This policy is also important because it is not limited to Sherman Act violations. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 10:51 am
Zuffa, LLC, No. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-BNW, 2023 WL 5085064, 2023 U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:30 am
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) Tuesday filed a federal antitrust complaint against Google LLC, which alleged that Google’s monopolization of “multiple digital advertising technology products” violated Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:37 pm
Social media networks probably did not come across the minds of the Sherman Act’s drafters in 1890. [read post]
21 May 2020, 8:47 am
The debates focus on (1) whether AmEx is limited to two-sided transaction platforms, (2) the proper way to measure competitive effects, and (3) whether AmEx is limited to claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
Can Deals That Do Not Trigger an HSR Filing Raise Antitrust Concerns? Yes, Buyer and Sellers Beware!
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
George’s Foods, LLC, No. 5:11-cv-00043 (W.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 6:01 am
Posted by Ira Kay and Blaine Martin, Pay Governance LLC, on Saturday, May 18, 2019 Tags: Executive Compensation, Firm performance, Incentives, Management, Pay for performance, Repurchases, Shareholder value, Short-termism A “Draft Review” as a Safeguard on Proxy Advisors Posted by Ted Allen and Gary A. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
By Chris Sagers[1] In the world there are weightier things than antitrust, and the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh involves many of them. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Posted by Ira Kay, Pay Governance LLC, on Tuesday, June 6, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Capital markets, Executive Compensation, Financial reporting, Firm performance, GAAP, Incentives, ISS, Long-Term value, Management, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Proxy advisors, Shareholder value, TSR The Failure of Federal Incorporation Law: A Public Choice Perspective Posted by Sung Hui Kim, UCLA School of Law,… [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Rubinfeld, NYU School of Law, on Monday, March 13, 2017 Tags: Antitrust, Behavioral finance, Clayton Act, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Firm performance, Incentives, Institutional Investors, Investor protection, Management, Ownership, Peer groups, Shareholder value, Sherman Act Is Disgorgement a “Forfeiture” for Statute of Limitations Purposes? [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
—the owner of Tri-Union Seafoods LLC, doing business as Chicken of the Sea International—and Lion Capital LLP mutually agreed to terminate plans to acquire Bumble Bee Foods, LLC. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:45 am
Dixon Gas Club LLC v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:58 pm
Although I do find that many junk debt lawsuits filed by Midland Funding, Cach LLC, Portfolio Recovery, Sherman Acquisitions and others will be dismissed when a written answer is filed with the Court, the more common experience is that the debt buyer will hit the consumer with lame discovery requests to lay the groundwork for a Summary Judgment motion. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:58 pm
Although I do find that many junk debt lawsuits filed by Midland Funding, Cach LLC, Portfolio Recovery, Sherman Acquisitions and others will be dismissed when a written answer is filed with the Court, the more common experience is that the debt buyer will hit the consumer with lame discovery requests to lay the groundwork for a Summary Judgment motion. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
Innovations LLC v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
Where unilateral conduct exhibits plausible efficiencies without serious evidence of competitive harm in a relevant market, it is impossible to make a viable case of monopoly maintenance under Section 2 of the Sherman Act (“Section 2”). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:52 am
The preceding debt buyers were Sherman Originator III, LLC, Sherman Originator, LVNV Funding, LLC, and Sherman Acquisition, LLC. [read post]
