Search for: "SHERMAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 1 - 20
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 9:10 am
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877, 885-86. [2] Cont’l T.V., Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 7:10 am
PSKS, Inc., 551 U.S. 877, 885-86. [2] Cont’l T.V., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
One study found that 60% of labor markets have a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) exceeding 2,500, a threshold considered “highly concentrated” by the Justice Department and FTC. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
V. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
The U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm
Department of Justice Leniency Program provides incentives for cartel members to tell on their co-conspirators and cooperate with its investigations. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In his merits brief in the U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
This can be seen in, e.g., the merger guidelines jointly issued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am
Justice Department (DOJ). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:23 am
Unless, of course, the action is one brought by the Department of Justice in a different kind of court. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 3:36 pm
The courts are already grumpy with NCAA rules that limit economic competition, and the Justice Department has shown a heightened interest in antitrust issues in sports. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:10 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Justice Department’s (DOJ) antitrust case against Google. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 11:29 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:26 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
