Search for: "SIMPSON v. BAKER"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
Canada An application to dismiss a claim under s. 4 of the Protection of Public Participation Act 2019 as a “strategic litigation against public participation” (“SLAPP”) suit brought by Rebel News was allowed in Simpson v Rebel News Network Ltd 2022 BCSC 1160 (CanLII). [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Sweeny v Ireland [2017] IEHC 702 (23 November 2017) Baker J in the High Court struck down section 9(1)(b) of the Offences Against the State (Amendment) Act, 1998 (also here), which provided for a wide offence of withholding material information from Gardaí, on the grounds that it infringed the right to silence derived from the right to freedom of expression in Article 40. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:29 am
The circuit court primarily utilized a Kentucky Supreme Court case, Baker v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:54 am
Baker, et al. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
“Bill” Priestap, Sarah Raskin, Steve Ricchetti, Susan Rice, Rod Rosenstein, Gabriel Sanz-Rexach, Nathan Sheets, Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, Glenn Simpson, Steve Somma, Peter Strzok, Michael Sussman, Adam Szubin, Jonathan Winer, Christopher Wray, and Sally Yates.According to both President Trump (in his personal capacity) and the Solicitor General of the United States, this Judiciary Committee investigation is unconstitutional, and therefore recipients of the subpoenas need not… [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Simpson also served at Camp Joseph E. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 6:06 am
Maldonado, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, on Tuesday, August 21, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Board turnover, Boards of Directors, Disclosure, Diversity, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Shareholder voting Corporate Governance in Emerging Markets Posted by Ruth V. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:51 am
Mattis, Dalmazzi v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Social Media The Media Blog discusses an unwise tweet from the Milton Keynes law firm Baker Small. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
Eight days before the attack, in response to a tweet by Simpson about the alleged oppression of Muslims, Miski tweeted at Simpson, “One individual is able to put a whole nation onto it’s [sic] knees. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 6:50 am
Stewart Baker brought us this week’s Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast, which featured an interview with Admiral David Simpson, Chief of the FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Jones III, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Jackson, Miss. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
BAKER, -v.- CHARLES SIMPSON, WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP is the story of a Chapter 7 petitioner whose case was converted into a Chapter 11 proceeding. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:42 am
The Second Circuit, in Baker v, Simpson ruled that malpractice occurring a bankruptcy "arises under" the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
There was once a time in Strasbourg jurisprudence that if a right was found to be “squarely within the domain of public law, having no private law analogy and no repercussions on private rights or obligations”, that would be fatal to the claim to a civil right under Article 6 (Simpson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
” Marquart v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 am
(The decision: Tropp v. [read post]
