Search for: "SMALL v GOOD" Results 1 - 20 of 8,337
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 1:51 am by itars sis
If either of these offenses are committed with goods of special cultural importance to the State, the penalty is imprisonment for up to 3 years.[19] If the goods are of great or exceptional cultural importance, the penalty is up to 5 years imprisonment.[20] Article 219 of the Criminal Code punishes the removal or destruction of goods of special cultural importance with up to 5 years imprisonment. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm by Ronald Mann
” Acknowledging that the justices in Vidal v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am by Eric Goldman
This case is a good cautionary tale of how a descriptive trademark can be turned into an unduly powerful weapon that ultimately hurts consumers. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
The hope is that it would be possible to check a manageably small number of them very thoroughly and accurately. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 8:28 am by Holly
  (v) Identify information system users, processes acting on behalf of users, or devices. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm by Frank Cranmer
This has obvious implications for small charities and places of worship. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Payment with a note also requires time and legal expense, which may not be justified for small equity repurchases, and typically the former employee is expected to sign the note and repurchase documentation, which they may be reluctant to do. [read post]