Search for: "SNAPS Holding Company" Results 1 - 20 of 407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Evan Brown
Snap, Inc., 995 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir. 2021) the court found that in this case, at least, plaintiffs failed to plead adequately a theory of injury under CCPA that was “fully independent of [Apple’s] role in monitoring or publishing third-party content. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Snap: While the negligent design claim in Snap was not predicated on any third-party content—indeed, the alleged harm flowed directly and solely from the negligent design and occurred without any third-party content—the same is not true here. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
” The president holds a largely ceremonial role but is one of the top four political positions in Vietnam. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:22 pm by Sophia Cope
The trial court disagreed, narrowly interpreting Section 230 and erroneously holding that the plaintiffs were merely trying to hold the company responsible for its own “independent tortious conduct—independent, that is, of the drug sellers’ posted content. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
Further, as a limited-edition art object, the handbag holds value beyond its material components. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:45 am by Alex Wang
To predict what the future might hold, it helps to consult history. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
Nevertheless, the gambit successfully navigates around Section 230 because: Plaintiffs here argue that Snap breached a duty to provide information about Joshi to law enforcement….Plaintiffs’ claims for Snap’s failure to respond to requests from law enforcement do not, “at bottom,” seek to hold Snap liable for Joshi’s content—they are focused squarely on Snap’s own conduct. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:03 am by David Lynn
Gerding also reviewed the Staff’s guidance over the course of the past few years regarding China-based issuers and the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. 3. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:16 pm by Content Team
Ashley Adams, a spokeswoman for Snap Inc., conveyed that the company would “continue to defend” itself in court. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:08 pm by Content Team
In recent legal developments, dozens of families have embarked on a journey for justice against Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
The Second Circuit’s holding in Force is dispositive on this point. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
The lower court was unpersuaded: “Doe’s negligent design claim similarly aims to hold Snap liable for communications exchanged between Doe and Guess-Mazock. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:04 am by Evan Brown
Doe sought to hold Snap accountable, alleging that Snapchat’s design defects, such as inadequate age-verification mechanisms, indirectly facilitated the abuse. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 am by Beatrice Yahia
-sanctioned company who is alleged to have provided aid to Hamas, and said there is no evidence of “abuse of our nation’s financial system. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, and its books will show transfers from one broker to another. [read post]