Search for: "SOURCING SOCIETY INC." Results 1 - 20 of 1,082
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm by Steve Bainbridge
”[13] Three months later Vice Chancellor Laster returned to the fray in Wagner v BRP Group, Inc.,[14] in which a similar contract was at issue.[15] In Wagner, the Vice Chancellor described Moelis as having adopted a two pronged test. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [6] General Electric Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Gatti also warns that corporate governing presents potential drawbacks for society. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:58 am by Ezra Rosser
A project of ClassCrits, Inc., we are affiliated with the pathbreaking Law and Political Economy movement, and our sister organizations include the LPE Project, the Association for the Promotion of Political Economy and Law (APPEAL), and the LPE Collaborative Research Network of the Law and Society Association. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
Apparently because of Jackson’s recusal, the court added Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
 Canada On 2 January 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia awarded summary judgement on the issue of quantum in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Pineau v Glacier Media Inc 2024 BCSC 4. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
., allocating a higher share to Wikipedia, the New York Times, or other sources that weight heavily in the model). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[15] So the cited source actually says the exact opposite of what the authors assert. [read post]