Search for: "STATE v. MEDINA"
Results 1 - 20
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:07 pm
United States, 62 F.4th 221 (6th Cir. 2023). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:46 am
Medina v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:09 pm
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Health Care) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2023.html Medina v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:11 am
Here is the opinion in Medina v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:12 pm
App. 5th 1111 (2019); but see Medina v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 5:40 am
In Medina v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:22 am
Arizmendi-Medina v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
Mencia-Medina v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
Pape, 401 U.S. 279, 91 S.Ct. 633, 28 L.Ed.2d 45 (1971); Medina v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 1:44 am
In 1949, federal district trial Judge Harold Medina issued criminal contempt specifications against the five lawyers representing the eleven members of the Communist Party tried and convicted of conspiracy in the case titled United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:55 am
After an overview of the regulation of market and data exclusivity and the regulation of orphan drugs, the speaker brought to the attention of the participants the very recent Opinionof Advocate General Medina in the joined cases C-438/21 P and C-440/21 P, delivered on 6 October 2022. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:04 am
This is referred to as the Brady Rule and is a result of Brady v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:00 am
In Newberry v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 11:48 am
* FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations… [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Gostin, The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade? [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 4:43 pm
González Medina v. [read post]
