Search for: "STATE EX REL B E A v DISTRICT CO" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The district court rejected this argument, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
District Court for the District of New Jersey to enjoin implementation of Chapter 324 and to declare New Jersey’s attempted withdrawal from the Compact invalid. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]