Search for: "STATE EX REL. ODDS v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
That would be odd to do if Section 788 had already explored that subject in any detail. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Trump’s contention that every officer of the United States must be appointed, not elected, therefore appears to be at odds with what the federal government actually did when it enacted the Oath Act, as well as with the oath Adams took two days later. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
And the odds of hallucination for that now constrained retrieval augmented dataset is very small, that you are more likely to have in practice solves the nation problem. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am by Dan Lopez
Should my valuation, the potential likelihood of enforcement action against my deal, would it be different ex-post as opposed to ex-ante when these guidelines are finalized? [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
He also continued on developing an SPC program in VB.NET which he shared with a fired ex-employee. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Audit system could be a solution, involvement of member states could be a solution, but we have to discuss the issues openly. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
   This leaves common good constitutionalism in an odd position. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
Even if U.S. companies adopt privacy-protective principles, they cannot stop the U.S. intelligence community from conducting surveillance—and, as the CJEU held, the breadth of that surveillance is at odds with EU law. [read post]