Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2024, 9:02 pm
Kennedy promoted Kaufman to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.About twenty years after the trial, however, evidence surfaced that Kaufman had engaged in improper ex parte (“one-sided”) communications with government lawyers while the case was before him. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:49 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 1:54 am
Com. ex. rel. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
") (quoting United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am
The Court of Appeal overturned [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
” When the case returned to the state court, the court of criminal appeals again denied relief, explaining that the state’s position on certiorari “add[s] nothing to what we were already aware of when we [previously] denied relief. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Kentucky ex rel. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:25 pm
”) United States ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court has imposed a three-part test to determine whether a work is obscene:the average person ... would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; andthe work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.[5]The purpose of the third requirement is, as the Court… [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm
For example, in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:15 am
State ex rel. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:41 pm
" K.A. ex rel. [read post]
