Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF I. C. Vs."
Results 1 - 20
of 665
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2024, 5:00 am
What I'm not interested in doing, however, is passing the buck. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 10:04 am
C. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 5:01 am
In an interview with C-SPAN, Holmes Norton argued why standing up for the neutrality of speech was important during the civil rights era and why "sometimes I gotta defend people who would not defend me. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 12:15 pm
The conference will provide an opportunity to hear from regulators and others in the nonprofit sector on current issues, including sessions on: * Matters of Current Interest from State Regulators* Artificial Intelligence’s (AI) Role in the Nonprofit Sector* Fraud Resilience Among Charitable Organizations* Boards Facing Crisis* Fiscal Sponsorships, Legal Framework, Benefits, and Pitfalls I had the pleasure of speaking at last year’s conference and enjoyed… [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 2:40 am
C-PACE Financing: Exploring the Benefits and Risks Discussion of Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (C-PACE) financing legislation available in nearly 40 states, and considerations for borrowers and lenders. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am
And there’s much of interest in the opinion. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 3:45 am
Schneider vs. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
See, 625 ILCS 5/11-907(c). [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Knower vs. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from John C. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Gregory C. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:05 am
On the Agenda vs. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
Bill C-59’s changes include tighter merger controls, revised marketing rules, and greater potential for consumer lawsuits alleging anti-competitive behaviour. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 3:12 am
Bill C-59’s changes include tighter merger controls, revised marketing rules, and greater potential for consumer lawsuits alleging anti-competitive behaviour. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
” Under section 106A(c)(2), the statute explicitly states that modifications to a work of visual art resulting from the “public presentation, including lighting and placement,” do not constitute impermissible modifications unless caused by gross negligence.[28] Mere placement behind wall coverings, then, should not constitute the type of modification proscribed under VARA. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:27 am
By Joseph Scapellato “I don’t feel like I’m responsible for people that have reactions to it . . . [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Departing House Members Ask: ‘Why am I here? [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
The Two Criminal Justice Systems: State vs. [read post]
23 May 2024, 10:30 pm
Conversely, John C. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
It has discretion in deciding (i) whether the grounds mentioned in the confidentiality application outweigh the interest of the other party to have full access to information following Rule 262A.5 RoP; and (ii) how much access should be restricted by defining the boundaries of the confidentiality club, having heard both parties submissions Rule 262A.6 RoP. [read post]
