Search for: "STATE v HANSEN" Results 1 - 20 of 583
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2024, 7:57 am by Kristian Stout
While S. 2305’s stated intention is to increase competition and reduce drug prices, it fails to consider several critical factors and could lead to unintended consequences. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action was correct. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ** Civil Service Law §72 applies to public employees in the Classified Service of the State as the employer or a political subdivision of the State [see Civil Service §40]. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ** Civil Service Law §72 applies to public employees in the Classified Service of the State as the employer or a political subdivision of the State [see Civil Service §40]. [read post]