Search for: "STATE v MCHUGH"
Results 1 - 20
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
From Luo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:43 pm
From Judge Gerald McHugh's decision yesterday in Tannous v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:29 am
In the case of Caeser v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
Through these cases the High Court elected not to follow the English approach (see Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd) which requires that another forum is clearly or distinctly more appropriate. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
"] From a decision Tuesday in Doe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
Allegheny County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 3:37 pm
From today's decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 9:39 am
Dist. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 5:54 am
The article addresses McHugh v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
” Hartz notes that plaintiffs rely on the United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:39 am
While the plaintiffs on appeal selectively cited outlying fees as proof of unreasonableness, they wrongly assumed that high fees are inherently disproportionate, the panel stated. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:50 am
Judge McHugh recused from this case. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
