Search for: "STATE v STRONG"
Results 1 - 20
of 16,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
First, the Strategy has a strong symbolic value. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
Circuit (Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 11:59 am
In addition, state-based reforms are often blocked or watered down by strong "NIMBY" ("not in my backyard") opposition, and by widespread public ignorance about the true effects of zoning restrictions….. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
” In Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm
Here, the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) and its then-Superintendent Maria Vullo made clear their intent to harm the advocacy efforts of the National Rifle Association (NRA) by strong-arming consent decrees from insurance broker Lockton Cos. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:55 pm
Cher v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:19 am
In Purcell v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:05 pm
’” Slip op. at 8 (quoting Landise v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:05 pm
’” Slip op. at 8 (quoting Landise v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:54 am
The plaintiff stated all the necessary elements to sustain his claim under the Consumer Fraud Act(White v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 5:23 am
International Court of Justice: South Africa v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Bruen,” which instructed courts to look for analogous laws in history when considering the constitutionality of restrictions on the personal right to bear arms, “the state and the affected subdivisions have a strong likelihood of success in the pending litigation. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
There are strong grounds for immediate action now to shield their faces. [read post]