Search for: "STATE v. DOODY"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of a lessee’s ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS… [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 12:44 pm
Supplemental bonding: Current regulations – BOEM can require additional security based on an evaluation of ability to carry out present and future obligations demonstrated by five factors: (i) financial capacity substantially in excess of existing and anticipated lease and other obligations as evidenced by audited financial statements; (ii) projected financial strength significantly in excess of existing and future lease obligations based on the estimated value of existing OCS lease production… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:10 am
As Lord Carnwath concluded after his illuminating discussion of the standard required of planning reasons (at paras 35-42), the question will be “whether the information so provided by the authority leaves room for ‘genuine doubt … as to what (it) has decided and why’” (at para 42, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Clarke Homes Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1993) 66 P & CR 263). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 2:30 pm
The case is Parker et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am
The court was told that after the third report was completed and sent to all parties, the complainer, solicitor Ms Crabbe, stated that the reporter had not seen all the documentation he was supposed to have. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Doody, 11-175, the AEDPA case involving a man convicted of killing nine people at a Buddhist temple, in which the state sought summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit; denial of cert. there as well, but Justice Alito noted that he would have granted the petition. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:44 am
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 centred on the constitutionality of s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, as amended by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Doody, 11-175, the AEDPA case involving a man convicted of killing nine people at a Buddhist temple, in which the state sought summary reversal of the Ninth Circuit; denial of cert. there as well, but Justice Alito noted that he would have granted the petition. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Mackey Davenport v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm
Doody, 11-175 (both from the Ninth Circuit, the latter case en banc), and Hardy v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:05 pm
” [via LexisOne] Jonathan Andrew Doody v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:34 pm
” Now, apparently, we call them the United States.Two weeks ago, I quoted Judge Rawlinson from the 9th Circuit who observed that if the dissenters in Doody v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/05/05/10-10229.pdf Doody v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 2:40 am
See Ryan v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:50 pm
The en banc Ninth Circuit granted habeas relief earlier this week in Doody v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:06 pm
Subsequently, the Court fired a torpedo amidships in Harrington v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:19 pm
" "Not so here," Kozinski wrote in Doody v. [read post]
