Search for: "STATE v. LOW" Results 1 - 20 of 10,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 11:31 am by Ronald Mann
” The issue in Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 2:38 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
It also noted that the sea level along the West Coast of the United States is projected to rise 4 to 8 inches by 2050, and possibly more than 3.5 feet by 2100. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
 23-1239, an unsuccessful “substantial evidence” challenge to the FAA’s suspension of a pilot’s certificate for flying a plane too low, and Schacht v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:22 am by Holly
United States Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 530-31 (2004). [7] See Entergy Corp.l v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
If the applicant shows that he is registered as patent proprietor in the national registers of the relevant Contracting Member States (as 10x Genomics did in this case), there is a rebuttable presumption that he has standing to sue. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 10:40 am by Dylan Gibbs
And he wrote an excellent concurrence (page 25) explaining why:COPYRIGHTPaywall schmaywallBlacklock's Reporter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 7:21 am by Michael Oykhman
Your chances of receiving a jail sentence for a voyeurism conviction are low. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
On the state level, only some Medicaid programs in the U.S. cover these visits. [read post]