Search for: "STATE v. MEJIA" Results 1 - 20 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Additionally, petitioner demonstrated that NYCTA had the opportunity to investigate the essential facts in a timely manner, establishing that petitioner's delay did not cause substantial prejudice to NYCTA (see Matter of Mejia v New York City Tr. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 9:27 pm by Unknown
Ct. 2400,2414 (2019) (limiting Auer deference to regulations that are “genuinely ambiguous, even after a court has resorted to all the standard tools of interpretation”); Mejia v. [read post]
Notably, the majority in Hodges recognized that its definition of public injunctive relief is narrower than that adopted by California state appellate courts in Mejia v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 2:44 pm by mtlawlibrary
Mejia DA 19-0527 2021 MT 136N Criminal – Sexual Intercourse without Consent Wiegand  v. [read post]