Search for: "STATE v. SAGE" Results 1 - 20 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
I’m pleased to write about the two cases again at the finale of their ten-year-long merits litigation odysseys (except in the unlikely event one or more losing defendant obtains leave to reargue or leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a… [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:17 am by Giles Peaker
There has been a lot of fuss about this, but as Tessa Shepperson has sagely observed, it doesn’t really make much of a change to existing law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
" Judge McGlynn offered the following sage reflections: "Nothing in this order prevents the State from confronting firearm-related violence. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, on August 5, 2022, the FTC issued final approval to a Consent Agreement regarding the acquisition of SAGE Veterinary Partners LLC (“SAGE”) by private equity fund JAB Consumer Partners SCA SICAR (“JAB”). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:35 am by Peter Mahler
Sage Systems, Inc. v Liss Rare is the agreement among co-owners of business entities lacking a provision for indemnification of officers, directors, managers, etc. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]