Search for: "STATE v. SETTLE II"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm
"Political conflicts should be settled at the polls, not with warrants and raids. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:24 pm
That case was settled in 2023. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am
II. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Here is how the explanatory note formulates the suspicion: “the Commission is assessing TikTok’s risk management related to its (i) potentially addictive design, (ii) the service’s risk of leading users down ‘rabbit holes’ of harmful content, and (iii) the effectiveness of TikTok’s measures for preventing minors from accessing inappropriate content, in particular age assurance tools. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:06 am
” The lawsuit settled with Easterbrook agreeing to return equity grants and cash with a total value of $105 million (which he would have forfeit if he had been terminated with cause). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
” “Custom” and “usage,” however,“ encompass[es] ‘persistent practices of state officials’ that are ‘so permanent and well settled’ that they carry ‘the force of law. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:42 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The HSP authors settled on a definition of “first use” as any use of a PPA product within 24 hours, and no other uses in the previous two weeks.[13] Given the rapid onset of pressor and depressor effects, and adaptation response, this definition of first use was generous and likely included many irrelevant exposed cases, but at least the definition attempted to incorporate the phenomena of short-lived effect and adaption. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Unless the operating agreement otherwise provides, a member acting without the consent of all other members lacks both the power and the right to: (i) bestow membership on a non-member; or (ii) transfer to a non-member anything other than some or all of the member’s transferable interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:44 am
In this post, Holly Ranfield, Associate at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 7:38 am
Basbanes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
