Search for: "STATE v. YEGAN" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 1:14 pm
(Bartholomew, supra, at pp. 780-785, dis. opn. of Yegan, J.) [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 12:51 pm
Justice Yegan doesn't say anything in today's opinion that hasn't already been said previously. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
  The state can surely respond to that by charging Mr. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
  So I don't think it's quite right to just briefly state that the appropriate rule here is clear since the statute at issue is (as Justice Yegan twice says) "pretty straightforward. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:40 pm
The result of today's opinion by Justice Yegan seems right to me. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 11:43 am
 Yet there you have it.Justice Yegan ends the opinion by not only awarding costs and attorney's fees against LeBouef, but also enters the following:  "The clerk is directed to forward a copy of this opinion to the California State Bar (Bus. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
 Vague memory from law school.Justice Yegan has an answer for that, of course. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Justice Yegan writes the majority opinion, and says it's no big deal. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
(United States v Desmond (1982) 670 Fed. 2nd 414, 420) The judgment is affirmed. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:12 pm
 The major difference being that when you screw up a cake, you simply throw it away, whereas when you botch the concrete, you have to rebuild the whole freaking pier.Or worse.Justice Yegan holds that the mistake here was entirely the fault of State Ready Mix, Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
Robertson and David Shea for Plaintiffs and Appellants. 92*92 OPINION YEGAN, J. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:33 pm
"I agree with Justice Yegan that there's such a thing as "sidetracking" and that, when it happens, it's a problem. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 11:56 am
 Indeed, that setting the guy free like the federal court did was an "affront to the judges of this state. [read post]