Search for: "STEPHEN GLICKMAN"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2024, 12:56 pm
Lay juries usually function well in assessing the relevance of an expert witness’s credentials, experience, command of the facts, likeability, physical demeanor, confidence, and ability to communicate. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:28 am
DeVeaux, Bradly Efron, Scott Evans, Mark Glickman, Barry Braubard, Xuming He, Xiao Li Meng, Nancy Reid, Stephen M. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Loon, PJ Hamidi, Andrew Glickman, Gregory Scopino, and Joseph Otchin in the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis; Connie Kiggins and Michael Hershaft in the Division of Examinations; and Stephanie Reinhart in the Division of Enforcement. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
Statistician 129, 131 (2016). [2] Sander Greenland, Stephen J. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
Although lawyers are known as a querulous lot, statisticians may not be far behind. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
You put your right foot in You put your right foot out You put your right foot in And you shake it all about You do the Hokey Pokey and you turn yourself around That’s what it’s all about! [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
A version of this post appeared previously on Professor Deborah Mayo’s blog, Error Statistics Philosophy. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:21 am
DeVeaux, Bradly Efron, Scott Evans, Mark Glickman, Barry Braubard, Xuming He, Xiao Li Meng, Nancy Reid, Stephen M. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Government Ethics Office Refused to Approve Kanye West’s Financial Disclosures from His Failed Presidential Campaign MSN – Grace Panetta (Business Insider) | Published: 4/19/2021 The Office of Government Ethics refused to sign off on Kanye West’s financial disclosure forms from his failed 2020 presidential campaign. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:54 am
Associate Judge Stephen Glickman and Senior Judge John Steadman also heard the case. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
"We cannot reverently repeat Wigmore’s famous dictum that cross-examination 'is beyond any doubt the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth,' and in the next breath condemn and penalize a defendant for using that engine," Judge Stephen Glickman wrote in the opinion (PDF), referring to early 20th-century American legal scholar John Henry Wigmore. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:06 am
Judge Stephen Glickman asked about the arbitrator’s contention that the purported non-prejudice agreement raised ethical concerns about whether the attorneys could submit one fee petition to the court and then argue for a different set of fees in arbitration. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
Associate Judge Stephen Glickman and Senior Judge Inez Smith Reid also heard the case. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:49 am
Judges Stephen Glickman and Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and Senior Judge Inez Smith Reid heard the case. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:49 am
Judges Stephen Glickman and Anna Blackburne-Rigsby and Senior Judge Inez Smith Reid heard the case. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:30 am
” Judge Stephen Glickman said that while it was acceptable for a judge to ask a jury to continue deliberating, he thought that the “curtness” of Rankin’s responses made this case unusual. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:50 am
Judges Stephen Glickman and Phyllis Thompson joined in the opinion. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:06 am
Associate Judges Stephen Glickman and Phyllis Thompson, and Senior Judge John Steadman heard the case. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
Associate Judges Stephen Glickman and John Fisher, and Senior Judge Frank Schwelb heard the case. [read post]
