Search for: "STEPHENS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE" Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 3:08 pm by Geoff Schweller
Tax Court erred in its ruling on a Internal Revenue Service (IRS) whistleblower award case because it failed to provide a de novo review of the case. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
She also represented televangelists Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker in a case stemming from their settlement of claims by the Internal Revenue Service that they owed taxes. [read post]
15 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Susan C. Morse
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, most justices seemed prepared to allow consideration of “equitable tolling” in tax collection due process cases – so long as a decision is written narrowly and does not spill over to support equitable tolling for other tax deadlines. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Dame Victoria was one of the two judges who, on 14 May 2019, decided that Stephen Laxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson) should face fresh contempt proceedings. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Major Philosophers Most Often Cited …it is not for the judiciary to permit the doctrine of utilitarianism to be used as a makeweight in the scales of justice…Stephens v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am by Christopher Walker
Internal Revenue Service is a good example of this approach. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Commissioner, a challenge to the Internal Revenue Service's treatment of cost-sharing arrangements for employee stock compensation. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm by Jennifer Mascott
Commissioner of Internal Revenue suggested that both of those factors — and final decision-making — are mandatory. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am by Stephen Wermiel
Commissioner of Internal Revenue), the dissenting Justice John Harlan wrote him privately to say he was “sorry” that he could not “sign up at once with your first. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Stephen Ostroff took over for attorney Mike Taylor as the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:49 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by Richard L. Hasen
These groups operate like Super PACs except they do not register as committees with the FEC, and they can shield their donors thanks to lax enforcement of their status by both the FEC and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:34 pm
Since the IRS is not a party to this proceeding and in any event would not be bound by any determination of this court under Commissioner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In defense, respondent alleged the six-year limitation period provided in the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]