Search for: "STEVENS v. HOLDER" Results 1 - 20 of 487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
George falsely represented [in the takedown request] that she was the copyright holder of the song. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am by Bret Cahn
(Steven S.), ___Misc 3d___, 2023 NY Slip Op 23416 [2023]). [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am by centerforartlaw
Under the Copyright Act of 1976, fair use is an affirmative defense to federal copyright protection.[17] Fair use protects a creator’s ability to build upon prior art and is a check on the power that copyright affords to its rights holders. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
Licenses, for example, grant its holders legal permission to use the work in a particular way. [read post]
In Nokia v Oppo, the former was the holder of three SEPs, which were important for streamlining cellular devices to be compliant to 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G technology, and declared as a standard. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Frederick (2007) and Holder v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
The major questions doctrine works best as a shorthand label for the traditional tools of statutory interpretation that Justice John Paul Stevens invoked in Chevron v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
It will focus on the s.10(3) trade mark infringement elements of the judgment and the potential impact this may have for rights holders. [read post]