Search for: "STEVENS v. PONDER"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2024, 4:58 am
Making videos of small animals being crushed by high heels may be protected First Amendment activity (really, see United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:40 am
Groff v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
What was the “gun environment” of 1989 in which Sandy pondered the second amendment, and how does it compare to that of today? [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 8:05 am
From today's Eighth Circuit decision in Nunes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
Ginsburg ponders the issue at hand (Art Lien) Ginsburg gets a laugh when she asks Rikelman a friendly question about Craig v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
Doug Stevens, IV summarized recent happenings in the South China Sea. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:26 am
The War of Art – a quote I’m pondering After reading The War of Art by Steven Pressfield a few years ago, I still re-read it every so often. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Before we can even finish pondering that, Alito is on to his second case, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:49 am
I confess I missed Professor Dorf’s review of Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism, so this is the first I have heard this exact point being made by him, and I think it is worth pondering. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
Steven V. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm
If you do not like Roe v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
’U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
Steven Dever, Lakewood, for Appellee V.M.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Glossip v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) In a dissenting opinion filed Monday in Glossip v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:35 am
However, avoiding that harm is not as simple in Al-Nashiri’s case as it is in the cases that Justice Stevens cited in Hamdan I as permitting federal court intervention, such as Toth v. [read post]
