Search for: "STUART v. STUART"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 9:49 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding mechanism in its 7-2 decision in CFPB v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia Synergy 360 chief executive David Milo has dropped his defamation lawsuit against Nine over reports that he engaged in corrupt practices with ex-federal frontbencher Stuart Robert. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:30 am
Connecticut and Eisenstadt v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Consistent with Guideline 7 of the 2023 Merger Guidelines, the FTC notes that over the last decade, Tapestry has already consolidated Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman and that Capri has consolidated Michael Kors, Versace and Jimmy Choo. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
The 446th session of the Maryland General Assembly concluded on April 8, 2024. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
” As stated by Stuart E. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
In commenting on Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:57 am
Or is this more of a Brigham City v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
The debate over this practice, often called government “jawboning,” will come to a head in Murthy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Introduction Most undergraduates are likely to become acquainted with John Stuart Mill's famous harm principle at some point. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
This note will touch on the concepts of personal liberty in the context of abortion in the landmark case Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 6:42 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Stuart Harrow, a longtime Defense Department employee, was furloughed in 2013 due to federal budget cuts. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:36 pm
Jones, and Stuart Kyle Duncan, reversed the District Court’s decision. [read post]
