Search for: "Safeco Property "
Results 1 - 20
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 2:28 pm
On July 21, a Liberty Mutual field adjuster inspected the property and recommended a scope of work that was more extensive than what Aftermath had recommended. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
Safeco Ins. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
Safeco Ins. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:41 pm
The Seventh Circuit adopted the Supreme Court’s “Safeco standard for scienter” arising out of the 2007 decision in Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Safeco hired Madsky Managed Repair (Madsky) to inspect the property. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 6:14 pm
Safeco Ins. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:39 am
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:19 pm
Safeco Ins. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:09 am
Aldo sued Safeco in state court for breach of contract and various violations of the Texas Insurance Code after Safeco denied Also’s claim for water damage to is property. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Safeco Title Ins. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
In fact, Safeco Insurance Co. of America, a surety, made exactly the above argument in Yard Works LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:54 am
Safeco was the insurer for Pulley on some property he owed. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am
Safeco Ins. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
The below is the HTML text of the original opinion in the Kimble v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Last month, a US District Judge in Seattle ruled that FPCPA action by student loan debtors in Washington against TSI over false affidavits filed in collection actions after CFPB-TSI consent order may proceed in part; some specific claims, however, were found time-barred under FDCPA's one-years statute of limitations. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:57 am
Safeco re-inspected the property and the parties still could not reach a resolution. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court, however, found that the plaintiffs’ proposed class definition contained no such Missouri-based limitation, and instead, the class consisted broadly of all persons who suffered a property damage loss caused by a third party; were insured by one of the defendant insurance companies; and whose insurer made a subrogation claim against the third-party or his insurer following payment to the insured for property loss. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court, however, found that the plaintiffs’ proposed class definition contained no such Missouri-based limitation, and instead, the class consisted broadly of all persons who suffered a property damage loss caused by a third party; were insured by one of the defendant insurance companies; and whose insurer made a subrogation claim against the third-party or his insurer following payment to the insured for property loss. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court, however, found that the plaintiffs’ proposed class definition contained no such Missouri-based limitation, and instead, the class consisted broadly of all persons who suffered a property damage loss caused by a third party; were insured by one of the defendant insurance companies; and whose insurer made a subrogation claim against the third-party or his insurer following payment to the insured for property loss. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
The District Court, however, found that the plaintiffs’ proposed class definition contained no such Missouri-based limitation, and instead, the class consisted broadly of all persons who suffered a property damage loss caused by a third party; were insured by one of the defendant insurance companies; and whose insurer made a subrogation claim against the third-party or his insurer following payment to the insured for property loss. [read post]
