Search for: "Safir v Safir"
Results 1 - 20
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
Normadien Farms (PTY) Ltd v SAFIRE Crop Protection Co-operative Limited (8960/2016P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 6 (26 January 2023) [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Matter of Town of Hempstead v New York State Div. of Human Rights 2023 NY Slip Op 02129 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Authors’ note: This post draws on an amicus brief we submitted in support of the pending petition for certiorari in Edgar v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
" The Appellate Division also noted that "Where police discipline is at issue, [judicial review] must allow 'great leeway' to the Commissioner's determinations regarding the appropriate punishment" to be imposed and, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, observed that it is for "... the Commissioner, not the courts, who is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department" to determine the disciplinary penalty to be… [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:30 am
" The Appellate Division also noted that "Where police discipline is at issue, [judicial review] must allow 'great leeway' to the Commissioner's determinations regarding the appropriate punishment" to be imposed and, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, observed that it is for "... the Commissioner, not the courts, who is accountable to the public for the integrity of the Department" to determine the disciplinary penalty to be… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
& Community Supervision, 151 AD3d 1433, 1433 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762-763 [1999]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
& Community Supervision, 151 AD3d 1433, 1433 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762-763 [1999]). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
* Many Local Civil Service Commissions and Civil Service Law §15 Personnel Officers have adopted rules or regulations similar to those set out in 4 NYCCR 5.3 applicable to employees in the Classified Service in their respective jurisdictions.** Mari v Safir, 291 AD2d 298, sets out the general standards applied by the courts in resolving litigation flowing from the appointing authority conducting a disciplinary hearing in absentia. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, reversed the Supreme Court's decision on the law, explaining that an administrative penalty or sanction must be upheld unless it is "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:24 am
"Other decisions involving administrative disciplinary charges served on police officer alleged to have associated with persons thought to have been engaged in criminal activities include Brinson v Safir, 255 AD2d 247, leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 805; Richardson v Safir, 258 AD2d 328; Delgado v Kerik, 294 A.D.2d 227 and Hastings v City of Sherrill, 90 AD3 1586. [read post]
