Search for: "Saker v. Saker "
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm
Topics include “Poll tax litigations and campaign information; Richmond Crusade For Voters literature and training materials; Prince Hall Fraternal Order of Black Freemasonry documents; Massive Resistance and the Byrd Machine; Interstate Highway System family displacement records; [and] Brown v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 11:20 pm
The decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Kenton v Slee Blackwell PLC [2023] EWHC 2613 (SCCO) is another warning as to the dangers of failing to give proper costs estimates. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Now out from behind a paywall: Law & Laundry: White Laundresses, Chinese Laundrymen, and the Origins of Muller v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 10:58 am
Back in the courts, a recent decision of Senior Costs Judge Gordon-Saker in Elias v Wallace LLP [2022] EWHC 2574 (SCCO) continues down the road of upholding the validity of informal electronic signatures. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:06 pm
I have already written about the case of Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) where the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker declined the Claimant’s invitation to award pre-judgment interest on costs. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 10:14 pm
Last week in Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker handed down a reserved judgment in relation to three discreet issues where I acted for the Defendant paying party. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm
While inquiries into the Australian class actions market and the potential regulation of litigation funders are not new[v], the Federal Government in the past two months has sharply turned its attention on litigation funders by taking two significant steps: Litigation funding inquiry: On 13 May 2020, the Commonwealth Attorney-General announced an inquiry into litigation funding and the regulation of the class action industry. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
" -Victoria Saker Woeste"Jessica K. [read post]
17 May 2019, 9:30 pm
It’s U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
Intellectual History Blog, Victoria Saker Woeste, American Bar Foundation, has contributed a post to Roundtable on Antisemitism: Anti-Jewishness and U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:43 pm
The Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker prefaced his recent decision on proportionality, in Various Claimants (In Wave 1 of the Mirror Newspapers Hacking Litigation) v MGN Ltd [2018] EWHC B13 (Costs), with the warning: “this judgment should not be taken as any attempt at providing guidance. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Recently posted in the Washington Post’s “Made By History” series is Victoria Saker Woeste’s The anti-Semitic origins of the war on "fake news. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 10:24 pm
In King v Basildon & Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust he expressly disagreed with the decision of Master Gordon-Saker in BNM v […] [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:48 pm
Much of the commentary on Master Gordon-Saker’s recent proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) has understandably focused on the reductions made to the “reasonable” costs (approximately a 50% reduction). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:32 pm
Hot on the heels of Master Gordon-Saker’s proportionality decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs) is another decision from the Senior Courts Costs Office, this time from Master Rowley in Dr Brian May v Wavell Group Plc. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:05 am
Kermit V. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:32 am
In relation to ATE premiums, the judge noted that this had not been in issue in either MGN v UK or Campbell (No.2). [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
The Law Society Gazette has a piece entitled “ECHR not binding over legal costs appeal, rules judge” commenting on the recent decision of Master Gordon-Saker in the case of BNM v Mirror Group ([2016] EWHC B1 (Costs)). [read post]
