Search for: "Sanders v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Sarah Huckabee Sanders The Doobie-ous Redaction Award: U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Unfortunately, as Anthony Sanders details for the Brennan Center's State Court Report, state courts have almost always gone along with SCOTUS. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Electoral College may have dubious democratic credentials, but that means for determining the chief executive may be superior to allowing incumbent political parties to change the rules whenever doing so will provide political advantage. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In keeping with this uncertainty, just yesterday, the Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded (GVRed) in Sanders v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
Before the 2016 election, Gill wanted to run as “a delegate for Bernie Sanders,” and talked to her supervisor, who spoke to his superior, and relayed back that a delegate did not run afoul of the Hatch Act. [read post]
Many amounts can be recovered through small claims court but amounts over $10,000 must be recovered in Superior Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am by MOTP
Unless appellate courts come up with some grandfathering doctrine to exempt claims that would not have been time-barred before the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Agar Corp. v Electro Circuits. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
Sanders, the Court turned its attention to the House of Representatives, agreeing with the dissenter on the three-judge district court, who had “relied on Baker v. [read post]