Search for: "Sandra Aistars" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2017, 11:15 am by Media Law Prof
Sandra Aistars and Jennifer Sands Atkins, both of George Mason University Law School, have published Amicus Brief in Fox News v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:00 am by Press Releases
The United States Copyright Office and George Mason University School of Law announced last Friday that they have formed an academic partnership, working through Mason Law’s recently-launched Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Clinic, directed by Professor Sandra Aistars. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sandra Aistars, Copyright Alliance: Worth distinguishing b/t creating new copyrighted work and facilitating new tech. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:13 pm by Jonathan Bailey
This panel is done jointly with the Copyright Alliance and features myself and Sandra Aistars, the Chief Executive Officer of the Copyright Alliance. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Legislation in general terms (except for the exceptions in 1201, which are good) last longer v. tech-specific 512.Panel IIProfessor Sandra Aistars, Clinical Professor Senior Scholar and Director Copyright Research & Policy, Center for the Protection of IP, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason UniversityDownload TestimonyInformed by clients’ epxerience but views are her own. 512 hasn’t helped creators; the bargain Congress expected was not achieved. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:48 am by Editor Charlie
Sandra Aistars directs the Arts & Entertainment Advocacy Program at George Mason’s Antonin Scalia School of Law and has also agreed participate as well. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:18 am by Jonathan Bailey
It also included Sandra Aistars the Executive Director of the Copyright Alliance, who criticized a recent “best practices” agreement between advertisers and the White House the she felt put too much burden on copyright holders. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
.'” Copyright’s Lost Art of Substantial Similarity — From Sandra Aistars: “This Article comments on a trend among courts hearing visual arts cases to de-emphasize substantial similarity analyses and shift infringement determinations almost entirely to the fair use defense. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:02 pm by Chris Castle
Rebecca Cusey:  Sandra Aistars founded the Clinic this year as part of George Mason Law’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property. [read post]
22 May 2016, 3:02 pm by Chris Castle
Rebecca Cusey:  Sandra Aistars founded the Clinic this year as part of George Mason Law’s Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 6:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (Michael Carrier’s empirical work tells a different story.)Sandra Aistars, Copyright Alliance Challenges exist for effective enforcement for all types of creators, and in ensuring that the public understands and respects the law. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:20 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Sandra Aistars, Arts and Entertainment Advocacy Clinic, George Mason University School of Law: Dow, DiMona, etc. are right. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
David Kappos, USPTO: small claims has come up before. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
ROBERT WILLIAM CLARIDA from Reitler Kailas & Rosenblatt LLC, New York, NY represented Sandra Aistars, Jon Garon, Hugh Hansen, J. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A couple of introductory thoughts: There are over 20 panelists per hour and a half panel. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 1:32 pm by centerforartlaw
By Alanna Pitre Emerging into public consciousness in the late 1960s, conceptual art was developed by artists as a means of anti-institutional expression.[1] Rather than adhering to the traditional art-making process, where craftsmanship, aesthetics, and high-end materials come together to create a tangible– often commercialized– product like a sculpture or a painting, conceptual artists give primacy to the intellectual properties of their work. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 1:32 pm by centerforartlaw
By Alanna Pitre Emerging into public consciousness in the late 1960s, conceptual art was developed by artists as a means of anti-institutional expression.[1] Rather than adhering to the traditional art-making process, where craftsmanship, aesthetics, and high-end materials come together to create a tangible– often commercialized– product like a sculpture or a painting, conceptual artists give primacy to the intellectual properties of their work. [read post]