Search for: "Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California Supreme Court Denies Depublication Requests In Livermore CEQA Case Addressing “No Project” Alternative
25 Jul 2022, 3:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 13, 2022, the California Supreme Court denied numerous depublication requests with respect to, and declined to review on its own motion, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds EIR’s Analysis of “No Project” Alternative To City of Livermore Residential Development Violated CEQA By Failing To Discuss Feasibility Of Purchasing And Preserving Habitat-Rich Garaventa Hills Project Site, Also Addresses Significant Issues Involving Exhaustion Doctrine And Adequacy of Mitigation
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Court of Appeal Holds No-Project Alternative Analysis May Mean More When Conversation is an Option and Reinforces Low Barrier to Entry Under the Exhaustion Doctrine
20 Apr 2022, 4:15 pm by Kira Conlon and Lauren Chang
In Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
League of California Cities and CSAC File Request for Depublication of First District Decision Addressing Sufficiency of CEQA-Mandated “No Project” Alternative In Housing Project EIR
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 25, 2022, the League of California Cities (“League”) and California State Association of Counties (“CSAC”) filed a 10-page letter with the California Supreme Court requesting it to depublish the First District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Sixth District Holds Downtown San Jose Office Project FSEIR’s Brief Discussion And Rejection of “Compensatory” Mitigation for Historic Buildings Razed By Project Was Informationally Adequate Under CEQA Based On City’s Unchallenged Factual Finding That No Similar Historic Buildings Existed Elsewhere In City’s Downtown
22 May 2023, 10:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
” Arguing by analogy to cases endorsing compensatory mitigation for projects impacting biological resources and agricultural lands (see, Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Clarifies That Agricultural Conservation Easements (ACE’s) Qualify As Legally Permissible “Compensatory Mitigation” For Agricultural-Land Conversion Impacts Under CEQA Despite Not Ensuring No Net Loss
21 Mar 2024, 9:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  V Lions Farming, LLC v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2022 CEQA 4th QUARTER CUMULATIVE REVIEW
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Patrick Enright
Save Downtown Livermore v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2022 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/