Search for: "Schrull v Weis"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2023, 5:25 am
“‘An action to recover damages arising from legal malpractice must be commenced within three years, computed from the time the cause of action accrued to the time the claim is interposed'” (Joseph v Fensterman, 204 AD3d 766, 769, quoting Schrull v Weis, 166 AD3d 829, 831; see CPLR 214[6]). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
Kupplungbau GmbH v Lerner, 166 AD2d 505, 506 [1990]; see Schrull v Weis, 166 AD3d at 831). [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:12 am
It is well settled that legal malpractice causes of actions have a three year statute of limitations (CPLR §214 (6), Schrull v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 4:17 am
Schrull v Weis 2018 NY Slip Op 07769 [166 AD3d 829] November 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department demonstrates that continuous representation may be applied idiosyncratically. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:27 am
Schrull v Weis 2018 NY Slip Op 07769 Decided on November 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department, which we discussed yesterday for a different proposition, speaks about the relationship between equitable estoppel and legal malpractice. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 4:14 am
Schrull v Weis 2018 NY Slip Op 07769 Decided on November 14, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department discusses how the S/L for legal malpractice in a non-commenced personal injury case is calculated. [read post]