Search for: "Schulz v. Schulz"
Results 1 - 20
of 202
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 5:59 am
Supreme Court confirmed the legality of Amex’s restraints on steering customers in the 2018 American Express v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:16 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Roberts v Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Families Association considered this issue in the context of the common law choice of law rules. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
By Lauren Gowler Picture this. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
SCHULZ, “Political private international law. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:59 pm
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jacob Schulz sat down with Robert Gorwa and Susan Landau to discuss a proposal from the European Commission to combat online child sexual abuse and the proposal’s implications: Raquel Leslie and Brian Liu discussed recent U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Stewart Baker shared an episode of the Cyberlaw Podcast in which he sat down with Tatyana Bolton, Jamil Jaffer, and Megan Stifel to discuss the first Cyber Safety Review Board Report and other recent cybersecurity law developments: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Evelyn Douek and Jurecic sat down with Evan Greer to discuss the role of Section 230 protections on liability for speech about abortion post-Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
In an ironic twist, the Times v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm
Yang Liu and Brandon Vines discussed the impact of Louisiana v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:19 am
Summit Diplomacy and Foreign Policy Performance after Trump Anne-Kathrin Kreft & Philipp Schulz, Political Agency, Victimhood, and Gender in Contexts of Armed Conflict: Moving beyond DichotomiesSabrina B Arias, Who Securitizes? [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 9:58 am
Anderson were joined by Molly Reynolds to discuss the week’s big national security news including alleged war crimes committed by Russian forces in Ukraine and Torres v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:44 am
Benjamin Wittes analyzed Judge David Carter’s March 28 opinion on Donald Trump and John Eastman in Eastman v. [read post]
