Search for: "Schumaker v. Schumaker" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
It was not until 1969 that the Supreme Court would recognize the First Amendment rights of students in the landmark Tinker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  THURSDAY The Rights Revolution in Action: The Transformation of State Institutions after the 1960sThu, 6/7: 8:00 AM—9:45 AM, Sheraton Centre Toronto, Forest Hill ·         Chair/Discussant—Sara Mayeux, Vanderbilt University ·         Ingraham v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Lee (University of Pennsylvania) on "Using History to See the Glass Part Full in Janus v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 7:46 am
James Schumaker is a retired foreign service officer with experience in the Soviet Union, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Afghanistan, and Yugoslavia. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Parental Authority, Incomplete Transfers, and Japanese Courts in Colonial Taiwan, 1919-1936” -Nurfadzilah Yahaya “Question of Guardianship in Colonial Southeast Asia: Arab Children under British and Dutch Rule” Commentator: MJ Maynes & Barbara Young Welke Panel 5: Class, Sexuality, Race and Social Order -Cynthia Greenlee “Due to Her Tender Age: African-Americans, Child Rape and South Carolina Courts, 1885-1905” -Sara Mayeux “Car Trouble: Adolescence,… [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:09 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Fourth Department, in Schumaker v Opperman decided that New York had jurisdiction to entertain a petition for custody. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:31 am by Stephen Bilkis
The Fourth Department, in Schumaker v Opperman decided that New York had jurisdiction to entertain a petition for custody. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 4:52 pm by Joe Mullin
Dave Schumaker Apple and Samsung are hurtling toward a major courtroom showdown that now looks like it can't be avoided. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm by Julie Lam
Schumaker, No. 143534, the Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Driver v. [read post]