Search for: "Scott v. Ore"
Results 1 - 20
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
” Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
Last week in the courts On 20th February 2023, in the case of Smith & Anor v Surridge & Ors [2023] EWHC 351 (KB), Judge Lewis found that the statements made by the defendant in a reference produced for the claimants’ new employer concerning safeguarding issues at their school carried a defamatory meaning. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 1:32 pm
The unlawful eviction claim for the cottage – Brake & Ors v The Chedington Court Estate Ltd (2022) EWHC 366 (Ch). [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
In Norfolk County Council v Webster & Ors [2006] EWHC 2733 (Fam), a case decided [pre-rule change], Munby J […] held that a case where journalists were permitted to enter court and observe the proceedings under an ad hoc arrangement was not one held “in private” for the purposes of section 12 of the 1960 Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Also, by the by, New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Domenic Gatto v Australian Broadcasting Corporation & Ors [2020] VSC 420, a finding that, given civil jury trails were postponed due to covid-19, that continuing a defamation trail normally required to be before jury before a judge alone did not prejudice the rights of the parties. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 2:40 am
Mishan (T/A Emson) v Hozelock & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 871 Since Arnold LJ’s elevation to the Court of Appeal in 2019, he and Floyd LJ have heard about 11 cases together, spanning a mixture of areas of law, some patents cases and some not. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm
On the same day Nicklin J heard the pre-trial review in the case of Nwakamma & ors v Umeyor On 25 June 2020, Jay J heard the pre-trial review in the case of Gubarev & ors v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd & anr. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
On 3 June 2020 the Supreme Court handed down the judgement in Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2020] UKSC 23. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 00857-20 Hayden v The Spectator, 1 Accuracy (2019), 9 Reporting of crime (2019), No breach: after investigation 00606-20 Clough v Evening Telegraph (Dundee), 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach- after investigation 00579-20 Westmorland v kentlive.news, 1 Accuracy (2019), No breach: after investigation 00285-20 Ratcliffe v kentlive.news, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019),… [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
On 11 March 2020 the Court of Appeal (Floyd, Newey and Arnold LJJ) will hand down judgment in the data protection case of Dawson-Damer & Ors v Taylor Wessing LLP & Ors, (heard 29 and 30 January 2020). [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm
During oral argument in 1996 in a case involving blockades of abortion centers, Schenck v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who is a co-sponsor of the bill. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
In M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:19 am
Moorjani & Ors v Durban Estates Ltd & Anor (2019) EWHC 1229 (TCC) (and also extempore judgment of 30 July 2019, on Lawtel). [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Fairfax Media Publications and ors v Gayle [2019] NSWCA 172 the NSW Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by three newspapers against an award of $300,000 defamation damages to cricketer Chris Gayle. [read post]
