Search for: "Securities Administrator v. COLLEGE ASSIST. PLAN"
Results 1 - 20
of 203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
Ensure Plan Language & Operations Comply With Tri-Agency Out-Of-Pocket Guidance In addition to updating the amount of the out-of-pocket limit in group health plans, employers, their plan fiduciaries, insurers and administrators also should confirm that the plan terms, and its administration are designed and administered in operation with the regulations and other interpretations of the three agencies jointly responsible for its… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 5:16 pm
Employers and other employee benefit plan sponsors, benefit plan fiduciaries, and their advisors and service providers should review and update their health and employee benefit plan’s definitions of “spouse,” “marriage” and “dependent” in light of new guidance from the Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division (WHD) guidance under the Family & Medical Leave Act and the Employee Benefit Security… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm
The heavy reliance by group health plans and health insurers upon internet based applications and portals to carry out online enrollment, claims administration and payment, reporting and a host of other key health plan functions makes it particularly important for health plans, their employer or other sponsors, fiduciaries, vendors, and other involved in health plan administration or using or accessing health plan data to verify and… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:24 am
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
The DOL DFVCP is available for use by plan administrators of retirement or welfare benefit plans sponsored by employers of all sizes. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
The June 28, 2012 Supreme Court National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
Following the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
Department of Labor Employee Benefit Security Administration (EBSA) Investigator Kristi Gotcher. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:17 pm
See Hercules Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in… [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:07 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent King v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:29 pm
Stamer works closely with employer and other plan sponsors, insurance and financial services companies, plan fiduciaries, administrators, and vendors and others to design, administer and defend effective legally defensible employee benefits and compensation practices, programs, products and technology. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March… [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am
A primary drafter of the Bolivian Social Security pension privatization law, Ms. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]